1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The grounds for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance, which the Plaintiff asserted in the trial while filing an appeal, are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance dismissing the Plaintiff’s claim even if each evidence and the result of pleading submitted in the court of first instance

Therefore, this court's reasoning is that "the result of fact-finding on the head of the Si/Gun/Gu corresponding to the Si/Gu of the court of the first instance" is added to the column of No. 4 of the judgment of the court of the first instance [based ground for recognition], and part of the judgment of the court of the first instance is written as follows 2. The plaintiff's argument that the court of the first instance separate from the judgment of the court of the first instance is as stated in the column of reasons for the judgment of the court of the first instance except for addition of the judgment

2. Parts 4. 9 to 13. Da. On the other hand, around 1979, the buildings listed in the attached Table 5 on the ground of the real estate listed in the attached Table 1 and 2 (hereinafter “instant building”).

(ii)in the forepart of the present building, sewage pipes of 1.5m wide, 1m long, 9.9m long and 9m long, in the forepart of the present building (hereinafter referred to as “instant sewage pipes”) around 1989, in the forepart of the present building.

(1) The instant sewage museum, a management agency, is a sewage culvert used by a part of the residents located in the area of the Sinju-si, and around July 2016, at the Plaintiff’s request for relocation, the instant sewage museum was closed upon the establishment of a new sewage museum in the area of Sinju-si, 40-2 around December 15, 2017, which was in the process of the instant lawsuit at the Plaintiff’s request for relocation. (1) As to the determination of the Defendant’s defense from the 8th page 12 to 9th page 15 of the “Chju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si,

(2) According to the overall purport of each of the statements and arguments in Gap evidence No. 11-6, Eul evidence No. 11-1, and Eul evidence No. 1, the following circumstances are recognized:

(1) The public notice of the bid in this case shall be made by 1/100 of the bid amount with the bid bond.