A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 24, 2017, the Defendant received a 112 report from C, a police officer belonging to the police station B police station in the Sung-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong, 289-11, on the road in front of 714, stating that “A vehicle cannot be parked due to a parked vehicle” at the time of 00:10 on June 24, 2017, and received a request for a drinking measurement from C, a police officer belonging to the police station in the B police station in the Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong, for a drinking test

The phrase “A,” and the above C, in turn, took the face of the above C at one time, obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties concerning criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes 1 to the victim and the victim at the time of their dispatch, to cover a photograph, to cover a brack brack image, and to brack bracks video CDs

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1548, Apr. 1, 201);