logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.10.13 2017고단4752
협박등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On November 25, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for interference with the performance of official duties in Seoul Southern District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence in Seoul Southern District Court on March 12, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. Around July 3, 2017, the Defendant was unable to receive medical treatment at a hospital located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, Jung-gu, and became a first floor customer counseling room of D Hospital.

On July 3, 2017, at around 10:30 on July 3, 2017, the Defendant informed the victims E (n, 56 years of age) who had been a mixed person in the above customer counseling room of the name of the nurse who refused medical treatment at the time of being admitted to the new wall of the name of the nurse who had been admitted to the new wall. At present, the Defendant has a

It shows the knife.

The term “a threat was made” and the term “a threat was made.”

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties as above, and found E again, after having threatened E on July 3, 2017, the Defendant incurred excessive amount of money (8cm in length, 4cm in length) at the customer counseling room around July 3, 2017.

피고인은 2017. 7. 3. 13:55 경 위 고객 상담실에서 ‘ 칼을 가진 사람이 위협하러 왔다’ 는 신고를 받고 출동한 서울 중부 경찰서 소속 경찰관 F 외 1명에게 “ 이 똥파리 새끼야. 짭새 새끼들이 왜 왔어.

Before making a bath to “Iam,” the driver of the police station at the Pestest Central Police Station, the police officer was pushed the above police officers and broken down the left hand of the F in the course of making a check from the above police officers.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and E;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G, E, and F;

1. Each statement of G, F, H, and I;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Investigation report (related to the analysis of CCTV images in the location of the incident, CDs);

1. Investigation report (written opinions on injury to a victim, and photographs);

1. Previous convictions: Investigation Report (crimes during the period of repeated crime, personal confinement status, and sentence of judgment) applies to the Act and subordinate statutes.

arrow