The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the court below acquitted the defendant, despite the fact that the defendant knew that the defendant violated the registered trademark of the victim with incomplete negligence or by infringing the registered trademark of the victim. However, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts.

2. In full view of the facts revealed through the evidence duly adopted and examined, the lower court acquitted the Defendant of the instant facts charged on the ground that the evidence presented by the prosecutor alone cannot be deemed as having intentionally infringed the registered trademark.

Examining the above judgment of the court below in comparison with the records, the judgment of the court below is just, and since the prosecutor did not submit new evidence in the trial, it cannot be said that the court below erred by misunderstanding the facts as pointed out by the prosecutor, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.