1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, KRW 53,073,972 against the Plaintiff and its related thereto, from September 4, 2015 to February 2, 2017.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning for the court’s explanation is as stated in the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the same judgment as stated in paragraph (2) to the defendant’s assertion in the court of first instance. Thus, it is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

Parts 10, 13, 11, and 8 of the judgment of the first instance shall be amended as follows:

With respect to this case, the Plaintiff agreed to be paid 9,00,000 won by reducing the debt of 1,200,000 won for the first and second loans of this case between C on April 4, 2013. However, if the Plaintiff was not paid by the above date, 910,000,000 won plus 10,000,000 won, and interest for delay calculated at the rate of 2% from May 1, 2013. Since C did not pay the above amount, the Plaintiff did not request for auction on February 4, 2014, and the Plaintiff did not state the above amount as claimed in the application for auction as 910,000,000 won for the above amount as 9,000,000 won for the interest for delay from April 4, 2013 to 30,0000,000 won as 30,010, 2014.

In light of the above facts, if the Plaintiff received dividends of KRW 900,00,00 in an optional auction proceeding between C on September 17, 2014, the Plaintiff shall be deemed to have received full reimbursement of KRW 900,000,000, which was paid until April 30, 2013 at the time of the agreement as of April 4, 2013, and the remainder of KRW 10,000,000, and interest for arrears of KRW 910,000,000 calculated at the rate of KRW 2% from May 1, 2013 to May 30, 2015, the Plaintiff shall be deemed to have received delayed reimbursement of KRW 90,000,000,000 as of the obligation to pay KRW 454,70,000,000; and the interest for delay of payment of KRW 464,701,639, May 30, 2005.