1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff shall pay KRW 30 million as consolation money for mental suffering suffered by the Plaintiff, as it continued an inappropriate relationship between the Plaintiff’s husband and C from January 2016 to June 2018, thereby infringing the Plaintiff’s husband’s common life.

2. According to the evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the plaintiff is a legally married couple who completed the marriage report on December 24, 1996 with C and one child under the chain. The defendant is a team member, and it can be acknowledged that C had continuously been a group of 4-5 members working in neighboring areas, who were known to him/her while working in the same workplace as the team leader, and who continued to have a group of friendship with 4-5 members working in neighboring areas.

However, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone that the Defendant committed an unlawful act with C.

It is not sufficient to recognize that there was an inappropriate relationship to the extent that the couple's communal life of the plaintiff and C was infringed even if it does not reach it, and there is no other evidence to recognize it.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. The plaintiff's claim of this case in conclusion must be dismissed as there is no reasonable ground.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.