logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원통영지원 2019.01.31 2017가단21984
부당이득금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

From February 14, 2008, the Plaintiff operated soup Cabababaoba (hereinafter “the instant so-called “Sababa”) located in Sabababa, B.

In order to comprehensively treat the sewage discharged within his/her jurisdiction, the Mayor completed the “E public sewage treatment plant” in the city, and operated it from February 29, 2004, and completed the “G public sewage treatment plant” in the city, from April 14, 2008, to operate it (hereinafter the “instant public sewage treatment plant”) from April 14, 208, and to secure financial resources for the expenses for the construction of the sewage system, the Plaintiff paid the fees to the Plaintiff as stated in the attached Form 1 “the instant disposition” (hereinafter the “instant disposition”), and the Plaintiff paid them to the Defendant.

In the instant case, sewage purification facilities are installed on their own in the instant rain, and the Plaintiff does not use the instant public sewage treatment facilities, which are operated by the macro-market, and treats sewage autonomously.

However, sewage purified through its own sewage purification facilities is being discharged through the public sewage culvert managed by the market.

The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Changwon District Court Decision 2017Guhap5196, Jan. 2, 2017, to March 2017, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking revocation of the imposition of sewerage usage fees, and the said court revoked the part exceeding KRW 100,150, out of KRW 100,150, out of KRW 1,211,01,010, among the imposition of sewerage usage fees against the Plaintiff, and exceeding KRW 14,293, out of KRW 1,74,780, February 1, 2017, and exceeding KRW 144,293, out of KRW 1,493,30, and the said part exceeding KRW 123,498, and the Defendant revoked the said revocation.

arrow