1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following modifications or additions. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary or supplementary parts] Nos. 2 and 19 of the first instance judgment shall be followed as follows.

In addition, there was a normal view about the first and second frequency test of the part.

No. 3 of the first instance judgment, "Around October 21, 2014" in the first instance judgment shall be cut to "Around September 14, 2014".

Nos. 3, 18, and 19 of the first instance judgment shall be followed as follows.

Therefore, the defendant 17,142,600 won [17,142,857 won (=40,000,000 won x 3/7, and less than won hereinafter the same shall apply] to the plaintiff A.

Of the amount sought by Plaintiff A), Plaintiff B, and C respectively 11,428,40 won [11,428,571 won (i.e., the amount sought by Plaintiff B and C among KRW 40,00,000 x 2/7)] and each of the above money shall be used or added as follows until July 18, 2015 (No. 5, No. 11 through 16, of this judgment of the first instance). ② D non-daturism prescribed on September 14, 2010 by the Deceased had the effect of medical treatment for the increased inter-patian medicine due to chronic infection and drugs with the increase in ALT, but it did not undergo a separate examination between the Deceased and his spouse within the scope of AT 120 as a result of the above examination, and it did not undergo a separate examination of AT within the scope of AT 20, and it did not have the effect of medical treatment for the above 16th of AT.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.