logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.01.08 2013가합14258
설계용역대금
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay 623,040,000 won to the Plaintiff and 20% per annum from July 25, 2013 to the day of complete payment.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff Company is a company aimed at building design and supervision, construction technology service business, etc., and the Defendant Company is a company that aims at reinforced concrete construction business, civil engineering construction business, etc.

B. Around April 2012, the Plaintiff Company entered into a contract for hotelE (tentative name) services and design (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the Defendant Company regarding the construction of the “D hotel” project located outside Suwon-gu, Busan, with the following content.

. Contract amount: 5,64,00,000 services and design work scope (Article 3): 15% at the time of the modification of the basic plan and implementation plan (including Concepted design), modification of the implementation plan and rental business, park deliberation, construction deliberation, landscape deliberation, etc., all of the design including building permission, civil engineering, construction, structure, equipment, electricity, fire fighting, telecommunications, landscaping, etc., and 10% at the time of the contract with 10% 56,40,000 when the basic plan for the amusement park is not paid, 15% at the time of the modification of the basic plan for the amusement park, 849,60,000,000 construction plan, 20% at the time of the completion of the construction permission including the book preparation, 132,80,000, 300, 1609, 406% at the time of delivery and cancellation of the contract (Article 40% at the time of the contract completion).

When design business is discontinued (Article 17): (1) Where all or part of the design business is suspended under Articles 13 and 14, A shall pay B the price for the affairs already performed.

C. On April 12, 2012, according to the instant contract, the Plaintiff Company submitted to Busan Metropolitan City a proposal on the determination of a plan to create an urban planning facility (FIE) (hereinafter “instant proposal”) (hereinafter “instant proposal”).

This is the defendant company's 201.

arrow