beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant BH receives KRW 33,052,926 from the Plaintiff, and simultaneously is subject to the purchase and sale of the attached Table 1.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is a reconstruction association that completed the registration of incorporation on November 4, 201 pursuant to the former Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (amended by Act No. 11293, Feb. 1, 2012; hereinafter “former Act”). The Defendants owned each real estate in the “real estate subject to sale” column in the attached Table of the Plaintiff’s project site (hereinafter “instant real estate”).
B. On December 30, 2011, the Plaintiff sent a written peremptory notice demanding the Defendants to reply to the consent of the establishment of the association, which did not reach the Defendants. On March 13, 2012, the Defendants notified the Defendants of reply to the consent of the establishment of the association, and on March 13, 2012, if the Defendants did not consent to the establishment of the association within two months from the date of delivery of a duplicate copy of the complaint of this case, the Plaintiff received the instant written peremptory notice stating the Defendants’ intent to exercise the right to demand sale of the instant real estate in accordance with the appraisal price pursuant to Article 39 of the former Act and Article 48 of the Act on Ownership and Management of Condominium Buildings (hereinafter “Act on Ownership and Management of Condominium Buildings”). The copy of the complaint of this case was sent to the Defendants on January 11, 2013.
C. As of March 12, 2013, the market price of the instant real estate as of March 12, 2013, which was based on the date two months elapsed after the delivery of a copy of each of the instant complaint to the Defendants, is as indicated in the “market price” column of the attached Table. The real estate of this case, as to the amount stated in the “tax amount in arrears” column of the above table, the registration of seizure by the administrative agency
[Ground of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including the number of branch offices), the result of the appraiser AJ's market appraisal, the head of Sungnam-si, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Mayor, and the director of the branch office.