1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. Basic facts

A. As to the Plaintiff’s vehicle A (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”), the Defendant is the insurer who concluded each automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle B (hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”).

나. 원고 차량은 2017. 6. 20. 08:30경 부산 강서구 송정동 소재 녹산산업북로의 ‘ㅏ’자형 교차로 부근(이하 ‘이 사건 도로’라 한다)에서 1차로를 따라 주행하고 있었는데, 피고 차량이 원고 차량 주행방향의 우측 도로에서 이 사건 도로로 진입하기 위하여 우회전을 시도하였고, 그에 따라 이 사건 도로의 2차로를 따라 원고 차량과 나란히 주행하고 있던 C 차량(이하 ‘피해 차량’이라 한다)이 피고 차량을 피하기 위해 급하게 1차로로 진로를 변경하다가 원고 차량과 충돌하여 원고 차량이 파손되는 사고(이하 ‘이 사건 사고’라 한다)가 발생하였다.

C. On September 5, 2017, the Plaintiff paid insurance proceeds of KRW 3,013,940 in total (= KRW 12,800, KRW 1291,140, KRW 1,310,000).

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry and video of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, 8, and purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s instant accident occurred due to the total negligence of Defendant vehicle that obstructed the course of the damaged vehicle while driving a treatment meeting to enter the instant road on the right side of the instant road. The Plaintiff’s driver of the Plaintiff’s vehicle normally driving on the first lane of the instant road in a situation where it is impossible for the Plaintiff to avoid an urgent change in course, and thus, the Defendant is obliged to pay the Plaintiff the full amount of the repair cost paid by the Plaintiff, who acquired the claim for damages by subrogation of the insurer, as the indemnity.

B. The Defendant’s vehicle was unable to proceed to the right side of the road of this case due to illegal stopping vehicles at the time of the right side of the road of this case, and also the Defendant.