Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On February 23, 2019, at around 22:47, the Defendant committed a crime against C, the Defendant: (a) committed an assault, such as: (b) a defect in the name of the Defendant; (c) a police officer belonging to the Seoul Yeongdeungpo Police Station E zone, called the Seoul Young Military Police Station E zone called the Defendant’s name, and a c (d) a c (e.g., a c (e., a c (e., a c (e., a c (e.), a c (e., a c (e.), a c (e., a c (e., a c (e.)

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

B. At around 22:56 on the same day as the above 1-A and 22:56 day, the Defendant arrested C in the act of obstruction of performance of official duties at the same place as the above 1-A, and moved to the E district located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul. On the same day, around 23:04, the Defendant sought to leave the toilet in the above E district, and demanded police officers belonging to the Seoul Young Military Police Station E District E Zone, to cut the lock, and the F assaulted F with the Defendant’s hand, “I do not have parents,” and “I do not have parents,” and f was f with the left eye of the F.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. Defendant B: (a) around February 23, 2019, around 22:47, the Defendant 1-A.

At the same place as the above paragraph 1, C arrested A in the act of committing the crime and brought the patrol vehicle to the patrol vehicle, thereby blocking the patrol vehicle and getting off the patrol vehicle in front of the patrol vehicle by hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect examination protocol against the Defendants

1. Each police statement concerning C and F;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling Table;

1. The Defendants’ choice of applicable legal provisions and punishment for criminal facts: the obstruction of performance of official duties under Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act.