Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

The defendant is a person engaged in the operation of a vehicle for which he/she has to have in the three logistics warehouses of the CA, Dong, Dong, which are located in the wife B in Young-

At around 09:30 on July 2, 2013, the Defendant operated a dynamic rush with no number attached to the rush rush in the logistics warehouse and performed loading and unloading work at a fluent speed.

At all times, the victim D(31 years of age) was in order to load goods, so in such a case, the defendant had a duty of care to properly adjust the steering direction and brake system of the vehicle to prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and went on the right side of the victim's left side due to the negligence of driving the above vehicle in the course of duty.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the Defendant’s negligence on the part of the above occupational negligence for approximately eight weeks abstinence in treating the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62 (1)