Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Punishment of the crime

Any landowner or person concerned, or any other person holding a right to the land to be expropriated or used or goods thereon, who is not included in the landowner or person concerned, shall deliver or transfer the relevant land or goods to the project operator by no later than the commencement

1. Defendant A is the owner of the goods located in S (containers, places of work, warehouses, toilets, shower rooms, fences, building materials, etc.) in Stitu City.

On May 22, 2014, the Central Land Expropriation Committee decided the starting date of expropriation on July 15, 2014, which was the date of expropriation by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport on the following grounds: (a) the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport established an agreement on compensation for the goods owned by the Defendant as part of the Act on the Private Road Projects for the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport.

Therefore, the defendant shall deliver or transfer goods owned by the defendant to the project implementer by the commencement date of the above confinement.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not deliver or transfer goods owned by the defendant to the project implementer until the commencement date of the above confinement.

2. Defendant B is the owner of the article E (containers, warehouses, offices, fences, toilets, pipes, pipes, fixtures, etc.) in the Sil interest.

On April 17, 2014, the Central Land Expropriation Committee decided the starting date of expropriation on June 10, 2014, as it decided on June 10, 2014.

Therefore, the defendant shall deliver or transfer goods owned by the defendant to the project implementer by the commencement date of the above confinement.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not deliver or transfer goods owned by the defendant to the project implementer until the commencement date of the above confinement.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements 1.1.