1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "The accident of this case and the operation of the defendant vehicle cannot be recognized" in Section 1 of Section 4 of the first instance court's decision, "F does not have a causal relationship between the accident of this case and the operation of the defendant vehicle, and does not bear any negligence to F.F. It does not properly examine the progress of the plaintiff vehicle in the process of changing the direction of the vehicle's progress after stopping in the parking prohibition zone. In other words, it cannot be said that the accident of this case was caused exclusively by the deceased's negligence." "F is not negligent in driving the vehicle without properly examining the plaintiff's vehicle driving at the left side in the process of changing the direction of the vehicle's progress after stopping in the parking prohibition zone and changing the direction of the vehicle's progress." This part of the judgment of the first instance court's judgment with respect to this case's accident of this case should not be accepted in addition to the exemption of the liability of the defendant 2, as stated in the main text of the Civil Procedure Act."

2. As such, the plaintiff's claim is accepted within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as there is no ground, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.