logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2017.07.07 2017고단307
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 2015, the Defendant was a customer who violated the Electronic Financial Transactions Act by around April 2015, and was a customer of the main office where the Defendant works in a non-fluent place of not more than Daegu Suwon-gu, 2015.

B Upon receipt of the proposal stating that “I would make it possible to use the passbook,” the head of the bank account opened in the name of the Defendant (on the account number C, correction of the clerical error in the account number C) and issued the passbook, official certificate, otp, password, etc. to B and issued 70,000 won in return.

Accordingly, the defendant transferred the access media for electronic financial transactions to another person.

2. On February 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from the above B that “I would use the passbook for use”; (b) issued to B the passbook, official certificate, total sump, password, etc. associated with the national bank account (Account Number D) opened in the Defendant’s name.” (c) around February 2016, the Defendant issued the passbook, official certificate, total sump, password, etc. to B.

Accordingly, the defendant transferred the access media for electronic financial transactions to another person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. An investigation report (Attachment of A Account Details transacted with A Account more under the name of a stock company), an investigation report (examination and attachment of transaction details of A Account), an investigation report (report, such as examination, etc. of a suspect-title bank account), an investigation report (Attachment of an application for opening a bank account under the name of a suspect), and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Selection of a fine under Article 49 (4) 1 and Article 6 (3) 1 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions and the selection of a fine for criminal facts (including the fact that the criminal defendant is against his/her depth and that he/she has no record of exceeding the records of the same crime and fine, etc.);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow