Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On December 19, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor and 2 years of suspended execution as a result of interference with business in the support for the development of the Suwon method, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 27, 2017.

[2] The Defendant: (a) on March 4, 2017, the Defendant: (b) around 00:30 on March 4, 2017, at the main point of “E” operated by the Victim D in Sayang-gu, Sayang-si, Sayang-si, Sayang-si; and (c) under the influence of alcohol to customers, who drink in the trobbs on the trobs; and (d) “Is the head of C

“Absinging that it was difficult to avoid disturbance for about 20 minutes by breaking an empty bottle on the floor of the main point.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the principal operation of the victim by force.

On March 30, 2017, the Defendant, “2017 Highly 828,” told the victim as if he did not have the intent or ability to pay the alcohol value, within the “H key point” operated by the victim G on the first floor of the F of the Manan-gu Manan-gu, Mayang-gu, Mayang-gu, Pyeongyang-gu, Mayang-gu, Mayang-gu, Mayang-gu, Ma

As above, the Defendant did not calculate the drinking value by being provided with 13 sick and inside liquor from the injured party, and thereby acquired a total of KRW 150,000 property profit.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 High Doz. 827]

1. Written statements of D;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Previous convictions: Inquiries about criminal history, inquiry about summary information of case, and copy of the judgment “2017 High Court 828”;

1. G statements;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (the intentional acquisition of the suspect);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is difficult to find an attitude of reflection, such as: (a) a person has been punished for the same kind of crime as the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; and (b) denying the crime.

However, it is a judgment that the injured party seeks the preference against the defendant.