1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff runs the authorized brokerage business under the trade name of “C Licensed Real Estate Agent Office”.

On December 9, 2015, the Plaintiff received a request for the lease acquisition agreement or the lease agreement brokerage concerning the third floor office of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government DD Building (hereinafter referred to as the “instant office”) from Rai Public Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Rai Public”).

B. On December 14, 2015, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to act as a broker for the lease of an office. On the same day, the Plaintiff visited the Defendant’s employees and the instant office.

The defendant requested the plaintiff to adjust the other terms of the office of this case to KRW 10,000,00,000, which is so high as to be required by D or D's public service. Therefore, the defendant requested the plaintiff to adjust it to KRW 10,000.

C. On December 23, 2015, the Plaintiff sent text messages to the Defendant with the following content as follows: (a) the Plaintiff’s response to the cost of human resources and human resources installation at KRW 15,000,000; and (b) around December 23, 2015:

Before doing so, I made a telephone call with the President of the Building Owner of D Building.

월요일에 시설비 1,000만 원으로 합의해서 계약서 다 써놓고 변심해서 다시 임차인 후배와 쓰기로 했다면서 계약을 깼다고 하시네요.

If the telephone call date was made on December 22, 190, it was required that the telephone call amount to KRW 15 million if the telephone was made on December 35, 2000.

I received as long as there was any person to enter into the contract.

If a lawyer dices a decision on his or her behavior, he or she can dice his or her character.

I would like to make a telephone. D.

On the other hand, on December 30, 2015, Liman Public Service proposed that the Plaintiff be directly contacted to the Defendant and the Plaintiff should be excluded and the lease transfer contract should be concluded.

E. On December 31, 2015, the Plaintiff sent a text message to E, who is an employee of the Defendant, to verify the intent to conclude the lease acquisition agreement, and E sent a text message to the Plaintiff on January 2, 2016, stating that “A contract shall be concluded on a monthly day ( January 4, 2016).”

The plaintiff on January 2016.