beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
가. 원고는 2003. 3. 5. 설립되어 2006. 10. 13. 토목건축공사업(등록번호 : 12-0145)을 등록하여 건설업을 영위하고 있다.
나. 국토해양부는 부실건설업체의 근절을 위해 구 건설산업기본법(2012. 1. 17. 법률 제11181호로 개정되기 전의 것, 이하 같다) 제91조 제3항 제9호에 따라 대한건설협회에 “2011년 건설업 등록기준 실태조사”를 지시하여 조사를 시행하였고, 2011. 12. 29. 피고에게 그 결과를 통보하였는데, 그 통보에 따르면 원고의 2010년 재무제표를 기준으로 심사한 결과 재무제표상 자본총계 2,330,847,955원에서 부실자산 합계 1,295,347,051원(= 부외부채 600,000,000원 가지급금 등 744,476,374원 - 출자금 직평정 49,129,323원)을 공제한 평가 후 실질자본금이 1,035,500,904원으로서 토목건축공사업의 등록기준인 12억 원에 미달한 것으로 나타나 있었다.
C. Accordingly, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the fact-finding survey on the registration standards in 201 and received explanatory materials from the Plaintiff on February 10, 2012, and requested a review from the Korea Construction Association on February 16, 2012. However, even in the review, the Plaintiff’s capital excluded KRW 30,00,000 from non-performing debt, and the actual capital was calculated as 1,065,50,904 [2,30,847,955 - [2,30,847,955 won - - 570,000 won for non-performing debt (= 74,476,374 won - 49,129,323 won)].
received notice as such. D.
On April 27, 2012, the Defendant issued the first hearing procedure to the Plaintiff and conducted the hearing procedure four times from December 11, 2014 to December 11, 2014, requested the Korea Construction Association and the Korean Institute of Certified Public Accountants to examine and supervise the report on financial management status submitted by the Plaintiff. Based on this, the Plaintiff’s actual capital in 2010 = 875,134,675 = The Plaintiff’s actual capital in 2010 is indicated in the written diagnosis of financial management status.