logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.10.02 2014고정624
업무방해
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is as follows: (a) around May 23, 2003, the Defendant’s joint ownership of C and D E-mail, Songpa-gu Seoul E-1,194 square meters and its ground buildings (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

(B) On August 2010, 2010, 150 million won, monthly rent of KRW 7 million, and the period of five (5) years, the restaurant was operated under the name of “F” until delivery was executed, and on the premise that the amount of investment was not fully recovered, the victim G (a new lessee of the instant real estate) who is the lessee of the instant real estate.

) With knowledge of the fact that the construction is being carried out, it interfered with the victim’s work by force, such as blocking the backway of the instant real estate in Songpa-gu Seoul on January 21, 201, and laying a house with a straw up, thereby preventing the entry of the construction vehicle.

2. We examine the facts charged. The evidence submitted by the prosecutor to prove the above facts charged is each statement and photograph in the complainant (G) and H's investigative agencies and this court. According to this, it is acknowledged that the back road of the above real estate at the time when the complainant executes a test on the real estate in this case was in a situation where the construction vehicle, etc. is unable to enter the above side road, because it was located in the defendant's vehicle and office, etc., on the other hand, it is acknowledged that according to the investigation records and the result of the trial in this case, the above side road is owned by the defendant, and the defendant was transferred to the above side road before he entered into a lease contract on the above real estate (on November 17, 2010, when the contract was concluded), and the defendant was unable to enter the vehicle by putting the vehicle and office, etc. on the above side road even before the complainant entered into the lease contract on the real estate in this case.

arrow