A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence 1, 2, and 3 shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, along with the name and non-sured (C) person who was the total responsibility of the financial organization of the phishing type, and the name and non-surbing staff of the phishing type, expressed that the Defendant would safely protect funds in the account by putting a false call to an investigative agency, such as inspection, etc., to an unspecified number of victims.

In other words, the "C", which is a general book, takes the role of instructing the victims to withdraw, remit, deliver, distribute a victim's money, distribute a passbook, etc., and his/her nameless assistance staff ("D") manages the organization, and engages in the role of solicitation measures to collect delivery books, etc., and his/her nameless assistance staff in the crime is to safely protect the funds involved in the crime by misrepresenting the investigation agency, such as the prosecutor, etc.

In order to play a role in withdrawing cash by deceiving victims, Defendant and E, by misrepresenting the staff of the Financial Supervisory Service, conspiredd to play a role in delivering cash withdrawn from the victims to other lighting staff.

On April 4, 2017, in accordance with the above public offering, a member in charge of the false name has been used as a large account while misrepresenting himself/herself to the victim F by telephone and misrepresenting him/her to inspect.

The money in the account exceeding 10 million won for protective measures would be protected if it is withdrawn and delivered to the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service sent by us.

“Along with the false statement, the victim made the victim withdraw 55 million won in cash, and the Defendant, upon receipt of the instructions from C et al., misrepresented the victim as a staff member of the Financial Supervisory Service and delivered money to the victim at around 17:00 of the same day at around 17:00 of the same day, the Defendant was arrested the police officer at the scene of the victim’s report to receive money from the victim. However, the Defendant did not commit an attempted crime by arresting the police officer at the scene.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court;