logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.11.21 2017고단4168
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant had his wife B, who had his wife conduct sexual traffic against many unspecified males, and had his wife use the profits acquired as debt repayment, etc.

On August 3, 2017, the Defendant recruited men engaged in commercial sex acts using "C" hosting app around 20:14, and received KRW 1.50,00 in return for commercial sex acts, and had wife B engage in commercial sex acts in " unmanned hotel E" located in Gu-si D, thereby engaging in commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on hosting details;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. for facts constituting an offense and the grounds for sentencing under Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act;

1. One month to seven years from imprisonment with prison labor within the applicable range of punishment by law; and

2. Aggravation factors on the sentencing guidelines: The scope of the recommended punishment [the types of determination] [the scope of the recommended punishment] and the aggravation area [the scope of the recommended punishment] by applying the types 2 (the brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic by business, receipt and payment of consideration, etc.) (the special sentencing person] of the sexual traffic crimes subject to the age of 19 or older, such as the brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic: One year to 3 years.

3. That the defendant shows his attitude to recognize and reflect his mistake.

However, the defendant, using a smartphone display system, which is a medium with high radio wave, induced a person to buy sex against many unspecified and unspecified persons, and let his wife suffering from mental illness conduct sexual traffic with him.

Furthermore, the defendant committed the same crime even though he/she was in the period of suspended execution [one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution (two years of suspended execution) and July 15, 2017] due to the law of the same law, even though he/she was in violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts, such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic (the act of arranging sexual traffic on July 7, 2017).

arrow