beta
Text
Defendant
A and C shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, and by imprisonment for four months, respectively.
except that from the date of this judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B On November 2, 2012, the Seoul High Court sentenced two years and six months to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) in Seoul High Court on November 2, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 10
around January 2010, the Defendants received a proposal from D that “to connect the victims to purchase at a low price of 100 copies of the locking apartment units.” The Defendants, along with D, proposed that “I would have sold 100 copies of the locking apartment units, and would have sold 100 copies of the locking apartment units at a discounted price of about 50% of the above apartment units. I would like to receive money from the above apartment units at a discounted price of 50%,” and D would have used the status as a staff member of the State Council, connected the above apartment units to the seller of the above apartment units. D would have explained the victims of the above apartment units to the victims E, etc., and introduced them to the Defendants and D, and the Defendants provided the funds necessary for the above business with the funds received from investors, etc., Defendant C would have received money from the investors of the above company in order to receive deposit money from the above company accounts in the name of the investors of the KF.
Accordingly, around February 2010, the Defendants met with D, etc. the victim at the “I” coffee shop near the Gangnam-gu Seoul H Station, but Defendant B made it possible for the victim to purchase approximately 50% of the unsold apartment units in locking out. Within one month, the Defendants may return twice the amount of money sold or received within one month. To this end, the Defendants concluded that it is necessary to use 30 million won for the employees of the NIS.”
However, this apartment is true.