beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for two years, Defendant B’s imprisonment for six months, Defendant C and D for a fine of 3,00,000, and Defendant E.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On January 7, 2011, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for at night building intrusion and larceny in an Ansan District Court’s Ansan Branch for the purpose of night building intrusion and larceny, and two years of suspended execution, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 15, 201.
On January 2012, the Defendant lost money by gambling and borrowed money from the neighbors, etc., and the economic situation deteriorates, the Defendant used H’s scrap metal to work as a cargo driver, with the mind that the Defendant loaded it into the cargo vehicle and deducted it from the cargo vehicle.
At H, around 09:30 on January 17, 2012, the Defendant heard from the victimJ operating the said H that the victim J would have transported approximately KRW 130,137,920 to five tons of the old sea transportation market value of KRW 13.5 tons of the damage J owned by the Defendant, and disposed of the above 5 tons of the above L from the above L to N, and disposed of the 5 tons of the above old sea transportation, and the above cargo amounting to KRW 50,00,000 of the market value of the victim O owned by the Defendant.
Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's interest and cargo vehicle.
2. Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant D, and Defendant E received a request from the said Party A for the sale of the materials stolen as above through telephone at a place where the location of the place is unknown at around 11:00 on January 17, 2012.
Defendant
B With the knowledge of the fact that it is a stolen, B calls to Defendant C who operates a secondhand in Q from the Jung-gu Incheon City P to ask for the relief of the Gu, and Defendant C has the duty of care to verify whether it is stolen by well examining the source, motive, disposition, seller’s status, etc. of the Gu, but neglecting such care and neglecting the determination of the stolen goods, thereby neglecting the determination of the stolen goods, and making the judgment on the stolen goods available to Defendant D who operates a secondhand goods distribution business in the name of Si interesting Si and Incheon City, and Defendant D neglected the above duty of care and neglected the determination of the stolen goods, thereby neglecting the determination of the stolen goods.