logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.11.29 2018고단7308
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 12, 2018, at around 23:45, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers concerning the handling of reporting 112, on the road in front of the waterworks business headquarters located in Michuhol-gu, Incheon, Incheon, the waterworks business headquarters, where “a drunk person is not a walker on the road” was reported 112, and was dispatched to the Incheon, the Incheon, the Incheon, the Incheon, the Incheon, the Police Station B, by inducing C to restrain the Defendant and enter India as his hand, and by assaulting C’s body under the influence of alcohol at two times on the left-hand side of the head of the drinking house.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the draft D;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The fact that it is not good that a police officer who leads a police officer to move to India for personal safety of a defendant who was on the road under the influence of the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is disadvantageous to the defendant. The fact that the defendant was punished several times due to a violent crime is unfavorable to the defendant. The defendant is a contingent crime, the degree of exercise of force is not serious, and the victim police officer was found to have returned to the earth to go against the following crime, and there is no previous violence after being punished in 2008, and there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine, etc. are favorable to the defendant.

In addition to the above circumstances, all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case shall be determined as per the disposition.

arrow