1. As to each real estate listed in the separate sheet:

A. On December 2012, 2014, between Defendant and Egympia Co., Ltd.

1. Basic facts

A. On October 24, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a loan agreement on an automobile installment financing loan agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “instant loan agreement”) with the Egypt Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “ Egypt”). On December 20, 2014, the Plaintiff lost the benefit of time due to the Plaintiff’s failure to pay the principal and interest from December 20, 2014 to the Egypt Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Egypt”) by setting the loan amount of KRW 54,810,00 as the loan amount, the repayment method by 36 months equal principal and interest, interest rate by 7.97% per annum, and the overdue interest rate by 25% per annum.

As of February 10, 2015, the balance of the principal and interest on Egyp’s Plaintiff in Egyp as of February 10, 2015 is KRW 53,457,202 (hereinafter “instant loans”).

B. On December 31, 2014, the Defendant completed each ownership transfer registration on the gift on December 10, 2014, from No. 42922, which was received on December 31, 2014 to No. 42922, with respect to each of the real estates listed in the separate sheet owned by Egyps (hereinafter “each of the instant real estates”).

C. At the time, Egyp farms were in excess of the obligation, and each of the instant real estate was the sole property.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 23, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. In principle, the existence of a preserved claim 1-related legal doctrine that can be protected by the obligee’s right of revocation requires that in principle, an act that can be seen as a fraudulent act was committed prior to the occurrence of a fraudulent act. However, there is a high probability that there was a legal relationship that has already been based on which the claim was established at the time of the fraudulent act, and that the claim should be established in the near future based on such legal relationship, and in a case where a claim has been created by the realization of the probability in the near future, the

In addition, it is judged whether the debtor's insolvency is the requirement to exercise creditor's right of revocation.