The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Sexual assault, 80 hours against the defendant.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentencing of the lower court (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor 1 of the mistake of facts, the defendant attempted to have sexual intercourse with the victim and attempted to have sexual intercourse with the victim. 2) The sentencing of the lower court is too unjustifiable.

2. Judgment on the prosecutor's assertion of mistake of facts

가. 준강간미수의 점에 관한 공소사실의 요지 피고인이 2012. 8. 13. 15:00경 피고인의 여자친구 E의 집에서, 옷을 갈아입기 위해 원룸 안으로 들어왔다가 깊이 잠들어 있는 피해자 F(여, 31세)를 발견하고 피해자의 항거불능 상태를 이용하여 그녀를 간음하기로 마음먹고, 자신의 옷을 모두 벗은 다음 피해자의 옷을 모두 벗기고 한 손으로 피해자의 왼쪽 가슴을 만지고, 한 손으로는 피해자의 음부를 만지며 입으로 왼쪽 가슴을 빨면서 피해자를 간음하려고 하다가 이상한 느낌이 들어 잠에서 깬 피해자가 깜짝 놀라 피고인을 밀쳐내자 “누나 한번 하자.”라고 말하며 몸 위로 올라타 피해자를 간음하려고 하였으나 피해자가 이를 뿌리치고 자리를 피하자 그 뜻을 이루지 못하고 미수에 그쳤다는 것이다.

B. The Defendant’s defense against the Defendant was consistent from the police to the court of the trial at the time, and the Defendant was exempted from the clothes in the absence of a usual panty with the wind, and did not attempt to engage in sexual intercourse with the victim locked as stated in the facts charged of the instant case. The Defendant denied the aforementioned facts charged.

C. In light of the following circumstances, the victim’s statement, which is almost the only core evidence of this part of the facts charged, is not consistent or recognized by the objective evidence at the time.