Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On January 1, 2012, the Defendant openly commits an obscene act, such as: (a) unloading from a building E in the middle of 16:30 in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, a student of FJ from G, H, I, and J, a student of FJ from the building E in the middle of 16:30; (b) committing a self-defensive act, such as taking away from the building E, a student of FJ, H, I, and J; and
2. On March 13, 2012, the Defendant openly commits an obscene act, such as: (a) unloading i, L, and H, a student of Fhigh schools, from around 13:00 on the Gudio-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, by using a scambling scam; and (b) taking a scambling scam and scam
3. On April 17, 2012, the Defendant committed a publicly obscene act, including: (a) the Defendant: (b) the Defendant: (c) the Defendant: (d) the Defendant: (a) committed an obscene act on April 17, 2012; (b) the Plaintiff, a student of Fhigh School; (c) i) fluor; (d) fluor; and (e) fluoring the sexual organ; and
4. At around 08:50 on April 17, 2012, the Defendant publicly commits an obscene act, such as unloading a P, etc., a student of a Fhigh school from the Ostum parking lot in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, by scambling the scam and scambling the sexual organ, and committing self-defense.
5. Around 18:00 on May 7, 2012, the Defendant committed a openly obscene act, such as unloading Q, I, N, and H, a student of the Fhigh School in front of the building in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, by cutting out his or her sexual organ and cutting off his or her sexual organ, and committing a self-defense;
6. At around 11:30 on May 11, 2012, the Defendant publicly conducted obscene acts, such as unloading G, R, and S, a student of F High School, from the studio slick-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, G, R, and S, a student of F High School, and committing self-defense by sing their sexual organ, etc.
Summary of Evidence
1. Legal statement of P;
1. The statements made in I, Q, R, S and G in the second trial records;
1. The Defendant’s defense counsel in determining the assertion of the chassis and the vehicle photographic counsel did not claim that the person who committed each of the crimes of this case was not the Defendant, and the criminal identification procedure is unlawful, so the witness’s statement to the effect that it is not reliable.
Domination and dry Prosecutor submitted.