1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a corporation that engages in the business of arranging domestic high school graduates, etc. with a study program (hereinafter “instant program”) under the name of “Educrod”. Defendant A is an online newspaper enterpriser that electronically publishes the online newspaper “A”.

B. Defendant A posted an article in attached Form 2 prepared by Defendant B (hereinafter “instant article”) as the title “D” and the title “E” on the A’s website.

C. The main contents of the instant article are as follows.

The Ministry of Education is expected to file a complaint with the prosecutor's office, which is the name of E.I.K. International Exclusiveization, and is advertised to educate domestic universities for one year.

The study program at issue is illegal as a program to be selected as a regular student at the university of the United States and to be enrolled in the second year at the university of the United States for one year in the name of international exchange student at the domestic university.

It is similar to 13 study programs, which are illegal study programs closed by the Ministry of Education in November of the past year.

A related person of the Ministry of Education argued that the student selected in this program is a regular student at a U.S. college, but the result of confirmation by the relevant foreign university shows that the student who is enrolled in the domestic university is a regular student to be actually enrolled in the relevant foreign university.

The study is introducing 18 U.S. S. S. S. 18 S. S. S. S. S. and 25 domestic universities as international education exchange system.

A related person of the Ministry of Education has judged that "the foreign universities and domestic universities introduced in Korea have been aware of this fact at all."

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, 3, Eul evidence 5-1, 5.