A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around September 19:50 on September 30, 2018, the Defendant driven an Epoter 2 cargo vehicle under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.297% at the section of approximately 300 meters from the Mana-gu B apartment in Ansan-si to D located in the same Gu C.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person engaged in the E-Poter driving of cargo.

At around 19:50 on September 30, 2018, the Defendant, while driving the foregoing cargo vehicle under the influence of alcohol as described in Paragraph 1, was driving the vehicle, and driving the D Part D, which is located in Sanyang-gu C, Sanyang-gu, Sanyang-gu, in the direction of eutic comparison at the inside of the art park, and making a stop in accordance with red signals.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall not drive a motor vehicle in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of alcohol, and there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance, such as accurately manipulating the steering direction, brake system, etc. and safely driving the motor vehicle by taking into account the traffic situation in the front and rear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to operate the steering direction and brakes accurately without operating it while under the influence of alcohol, and caused the collision of the front part of the H urban bus owned by the victim F (52 years old) who was in the signal atmosphere behind the same direction, with the rear part of the above cargo vehicle, thereby damaging approximately KRW 97,300 of the repair cost, such as the replacement of the front part of the bus.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is a person who owns two cargo vehicles.

No automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance shall be operated on a road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated the foregoing cargo vehicle which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in Paragraph 2.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. The report on traffic accidents (the actual survey report);