logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.06.08 2015고단2592
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

The application of the applicant for compensation of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 30, 2007, the Defendant was released on August 14, 2009 and completed the execution of the above sentence on October 6, 2009, when he was sentenced to imprisonment for fraud at Daejeon District Court for two years and six months.

On June 15, 2010, the Defendant stated that “AF restaurant operated in Ma, Pacheon-si (State), Pacheon-si, Pacheon-si, 2592, the Defendant paid the security deposit for the construction work to H, victim C, and victim I, who is an employee of the victim G, “AF store work until July 2010,” in order to participate in the above chain store work.”

However, (State) EE did not have the ability to recruit and operate franchise franchise stores around that time, so the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to allow the victims to undergo the above chain store construction.

Around June 24, 2010, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 10 million from the victim G to the (State) E account on June 24, 2010, and obtained KRW 30 million in total eight times from June 15, 2010 to July 9, 2010 from the victims as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table of crimes.

The Defendant is a person who actually operates a company while serving as the head of the headquarters of the E (ju) E, a business entity operating the franchise restaurant located in the J of Yangju-si.

On January 29, 2010, the Defendant made a proposal to the effect that “When advance payment of construction deposit is made, the Defendant will take exclusive charge of interior interior interior interior interior interior interior of (ju) E 50 franchise stores for the next two years.”

However, at the time (State) EE did not have the ability to recruit and operate a franchise franchise franchise store at that time, so there was no intention or ability to contract the franchise franchise to the victim according to the agreement.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to it.

arrow