logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.01.13 2015나305311
채무부존재확인 등
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On February 24, 2014, the Plaintiff’s husband B was phoneed by a person who was a counselor for a new bank bank with mobile phone C established under the Plaintiff’s name on February 24, 2014. On February 25, 2014, the following day, the Plaintiff asked him/her about the opening of a head of a head of a head of a head office by posting a phone via D, the phone number of the above phone call number, and the person who introduced himself/herself as E (hereinafter referred to as “E for convenience”).

2) The Plaintiff’s name, resident registration number, and address was notified to B. 2) After the locking, E sent phone again to B, and “The Party head is aware of the opening of a Maspbook because the bank transaction performance is low, it is possible to obtain KRW 30 million loan, and the transaction performance is also performed on behalf of the Plaintiff.” The Party B asked the main bank bank, and the Party B notified E of the account number of the Daegu Bank N Account (hereinafter “Tgu Bank Account”) in the name of the Plaintiff.

3) B introduced the person whom E was introduced as his superior (the Director was introduced as the Director of G in the new bank).

(hereinafter referred to as “G for convenience”) listen to the words that it is necessary for the business of accumulating transaction performance from the G, and visit the new branch of the YU to visit the new branch of the YU and then opened the account in the name of the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “the YFC Account”).

(B) After applying for Internet banking, G was informed of the account number, password, and security card number of the said account. (b) On February 28, 2014, the offender who conspireds to engage in the crime of telephone financial fraud and the crime of telephone financial fraud (hereinafter referred to as “influence winner”) was issued an authorized certificate under the Plaintiff’s name, resident registration number, address, the account number of Daegu Bank Account, the account number of the Daegu Bank Account, the account number, the account number, password, and the security card number of the Kopo Agricultural Bank Account for which the application for Internet banking was filed, using the Plaintiff’s name, resident registration number, address, the number of the Daegu Bank Account, and the security card number.

arrow