beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff, who is engaged in fishery products distribution business under the trade name of “G” or “H”, supplied spawal spawal spawal spawal spawal spawal spawal spawals at the time of the implementation of the I business (hereinafter “instant business”). The Defendants are fishing village fraternities in the Seosan City
B. If the instant project contributes money equivalent to 40% of the purchase price of the spathal spathal spathal spathal spaths to the fishing village fraternity seeking to purchase the spathal spathal spathal spathal spaths, the amount equivalent to 60% of the purchase price of the spathal spathal spathal spathal spathal spathals from
C. From August 2008 to October 2008, the Plaintiff and the head of fishing village fraternity, who was the representative of the Defendants, obtained a certificate of agreement with the Defendants as if they were to use for the instant business by contributing an amount equivalent to their own shares, and submitted it to the Seosan City and received subsidies from the Seosan City. After purchasing the saf paper paper by paying the sum of the above self-charges and subsidies, the Plaintiff returned the amount equivalent to the above saf paper to the Defendants, and the Defendants entered into an agreement with the Defendants to sell the saf paper paper to the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant agreement”). D.
The Defendants, around October 2008 or around November 2008, shall attach a certificate of deposit to each of their own contributions (Defendant B fishing village fraternities KRW 5.21 million, Defendant C fishing village fraternity KRW 9.210,00,000, Defendant D fishing village fraternity KRW 8.1010,000, Defendant E fishing village fraternity, Defendant F fishing village fraternity KRW 1.2 million, and Defendant F fishing village fraternity) to each of the instant contributions to the Defendant’s own contributions as if the Defendants were to contribute their own contributions to the instant projects at Seosan City, respectively.