Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the lower court (one hundred months of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. We examine both the defendant and prosecutor’s each of the unfair sentencing arguments.

In the past, the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case, and there is no record of criminal punishment or punishment exceeding the fine due to the same kind of crime, and there is little profit that the defendant actually acquired due to the crime of this case.

On the other hand, the instant crime aiding and abetting the so-called “Singing” crime, which is composed of systematic and intelligent methods, by informing the Defendant of the account and password to be used for the criminal act of licensing fraud, and requires strict punishment in that it causes adverse effects on society as a whole by massing the unspecified number of victims.

In addition, when comprehensively taking into account the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and various other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the instant records and the previous theories, the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed appropriate, and it does not seem unfair because it is too excessive or too heavy.

Therefore, the above argument by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.