Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
Basic Facts
On May 16, 1974, the Governor of the Gyeonggi-do publicly announced the determination of urban planning facilities that are to be developed as a "E Park" (hereinafter referred to as the "E Park") which is a neighboring park with the area of 487,00 square meters in Goyang-gun D, Goyang-gun.
(Public Notice B, hereinafter “instant determination of urban planning facilities.” After that, the project name according to the determination of the instant urban planning facilities is “urban planning facilities (F) projects” (hereinafter “instant park project”), and the area where the determination of the relevant facilities was made “41,421m2” in the area where the urban planning facilities were determined was “41,421m2”.
(hereinafter “instant zone”). The Governor of the Gyeonggi-do publicly announced a park building plan for part (7,526 square meters, which is the entire area at the time) of the instant park as H on April 25, 1991. On April 27, 1993, the Governor of the Gyeonggi-do determined and publicly announced the creation plan for the entire park, and thereafter, the Defendant who succeeded to the right thereafter determined and publicly announced the building plan for each of the instant parks on July 4, 2005 as I, Goyang-si publicly announced on July 24, 201, J, Goyang-si public announced on July 24, 2015, K-si public announced on June 9, 2016, and Goyang-si public announced on December 28, 2018.
On July 1, 2010, pursuant to Articles 86 and 88 of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act (hereinafter “National Land Planning Act”), the Defendant publicly announced the designation and authorization of the implementation plan for the implementation of the instant park project as a project implementer pursuant to the implementation area for which 27,282 square meters are to be implemented (M in Gyeyang City), and publicly announced the approval of the implementation plan for changing the determined area of the facilities, the implementation area, and the completion plan for completion of the instant urban planning facility for four times thereafter, and on December 26, 2016, the Defendant publicly announced that the construction for creating “F” (hereinafter “instant park construction”) of the implementation area for 28,761.2 square meters of the facility-determined area (hereinafter “instant one”).
(N) The plaintiff of this case.