logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.11.07 2017고단1537
근로기준법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is the actual manager of “D” located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and is an employer who engages in the manufacturing industry using full-time workers. On December 20, 2014, “9,112,900 won” indicated in the facts charged in the facts charged in the amount of KRW 9,112,90 for retired workers E is erroneous and written.

B In the absence of agreement between the parties on the extension of the payment deadline between the parties, the payment was not made within 14 days from the date of the above retirement.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Articles 109(1) and 36 of the Labor Standards Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of an intention: Article 109 (2) of the Labor Standards Act;

C. Around November 6, 2017, after the institution of public prosecution, a written agreement is submitted on the fourth day of the same month stating the purport that the above employee does not want to be punished by the defendant.

Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow