logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.05.10 2017나86088
신용카드이용대금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance on the principal lawsuit, the lower court against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) that exceeds the following amount ordered to pay.

Reasons

1. Basic facts of the claim ① Around August 11, 2001, the Defendant entered into an agreement with the Plaintiff to enter into a credit card membership agreement with the Plaintiff to use the credit card and began to use the credit card around that time. Around August 18, 2006, the Defendant received a re-issuance of the credit card type by replacing it and used it directly. ② The Defendant reported the birth of Nonparty B (the Defendant with the intention of adoption) to his father at the time of the above-mentioned credit card, but the Defendant did not issue it to the Defendant on the 6th day of May 26, 201, and notified the Defendant of the password’s number to use it, ③ the e-mail address and mobile phone number of the Defendant’s member information, ④ the Defendant’s automatic credit card name changed to the e-mail number, ④ the Defendant’s e-mail delivery to the Defendant’s first new credit card name with the Defendant’s e-mail expiration date as stated in B’s 2011 and 216.7.

arrow