logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2013.02.01 2012가합5872
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 199,774,028 among the Plaintiff and KRW 100,000 among the Plaintiff and KRW 100,00 from May 26, 2012, and KRW 99,73,928.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant’s exercise of the Defendant’s right of retention, etc. (1) on August 20, 201, and December 15, 2001, each of the real estate listed in the attached Tables 1 and 2 on the land of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B large 510.4 square meters (hereinafter “instant officetel”), and in the case of classification by the list, “instant real estate” according to the sequence in the list.

(3) No less than 100 days (hereinafter referred to as “the 190s”) shall be

B) On May 9, 2002, C, a creditor of the instant officetel, filed an application for voluntary auction with Seoul Western District Court D on the instant officetel, and the Defendant filed a lien with the said court, on May 9, 2002, on the ground that C, a creditor of the instant officetel, did not pay the said construction cost even after concluding a contract under which the said officetel was awarded a total of KRW 2,870,000,000,000 for the construction cost and completed the said construction.

3) On July 11, 2005, E received a loan from a financial institution when the Defendant renounced the right of retention from the financial institution and sold the said officetel in lots to the Defendant. The Defendant submitted a report on the waiver of the right of retention to the court of auction around that time. The Defendant is responsible for the purchase price of the instant officetel between E and E on November 21, 2005 (Articles 1 and 2). The Defendant waives the right of retention on the instant officetel (Articles 1 and 2). E pays 2.8 billion won to the Defendant in five equal installments from November 2005 to March 2006 (Article 3). E purchased the instant officetel without the Defendant’s consent, and then transferred its ownership to a third party, etc., or entered into a new agreement with the third party (Article 4).

5 The defendant shall pay KRW 2.8 billion in return for the waiver of the right of retention by E.

arrow