1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On May 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) executed a seizure of corporeal movables on the attached list in the Gu C and 309 Dong 2001, while the original copy of the payment order in the Suwon District Court case 2016 tea 2262 was known to the Defendant’s non-party B as the executive title.

B. The plaintiff is residing together with the non-party B in the above domicile.

2. The Plaintiff asserted to the effect that the execution of the seizure of corporeal movables of this case should not be denied since the movables listed in the attached list are not owned by Nonparty B, but owned by himself. However, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the movables listed in the attached list are owned by the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this differently. Therefore, the Plaintiff

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.