logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.11.06 2013구단14514
장해급여부지급처분취소
Text

1. On May 10, 2013, the defendant revoked a disposition on the salary of a site for disability benefits rendered to the plaintiff.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 9, 2009, while the Plaintiff worked as the main kitchen of the “B restaurant” from February 9, 2007, the Plaintiff received a disposition of non-approval on the ground that on April 29, 2009, the Plaintiff applied for medical care on April 30, 2009 with the name of the injury and disease (hereinafter “the instant approved disease”) - the front part of the water supply control unit, the lower part of the water supply control, and the first part of the medical care until September 30, 2009, the Plaintiff received medical care on May 25, 2010 and the second part of the medical care on July 12, 2010 on the ground that there was an application for additional disease and additional medical care, but is irrelevant to the approved sentence.

B. On September 9, 2010, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for medical care as of May 3, 2010 regarding the instant applicant injury and disease, but received a disposition of non-approval on October 21, 2010, and on January 12, 2011, filed an application for medical care for the instant approved injury and disease on the ground that “the restriction on the distribution of 2, 4, and 5 resin on the well-known side, and the need for medical care after the preservation of the treatment.”

C. On January 17, 2011, the Defendant approved additional medical care in accordance with the result of a panel of advisory opinions that it is reasonable to determine additional medical care in the state of need of progress observation due to a disaster on March 9, 2009, and the Plaintiff was given medical care until September 30, 2011, when referring to the right-hand side therapy (the right-hand side thalves damage and the left-hand side thalves damage are observed, the right-hand side damage is likely to cause thalves damage, and the left-hand side is likely to cause thalves pressure pressure by thalves. The right-hand side is required to observe, and the right-hand side side is required to undergo an surgery, and the Plaintiff was given medical care by September 30, 201.

On April 9, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a claim for disability benefits with the Defendant on the right-hand side part of the name of the sick and wounded, and the Defendant filed a claim for disability benefits with the Defendant on May 10, 2013.

arrow