1. Within the scope of the property inherited from the network D, to the Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A is 12,648,167 won and 11,930.

In full view of the purport of the entire arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, it may be recognized as the grounds for the claim and the facts stated as the changed grounds for the claim.

According to the above facts, the Defendants inherited D’s indemnity liability to D’s Plaintiff in proportion to their respective shares of inheritance. Since they qualified acceptance was made on D’s inheritance, they are obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 12,648,167 equivalent to the 3/7 shares of the above debt and KRW 11,930,725 of the total amount of KRW 12,648,167 equivalent to the 3/7 shares of the above debt and KRW 11,930,725 of the aforementioned debt, Defendant B and C respectively, and KRW 7,953,817 of the total amount of KRW 8,953,811 from January 28, 2016 to April 15, 2016, the delivery date of a copy of the application for modification of the purport of the claim and the cause of the claim as stated in the Civil Act until April 22, 2016.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified, and all of them are accepted.