Defendants are not guilty, and each of them dismissed the request of the applicant for compensation.

1. Defendant A, the facts charged, “2012 Highest 430,” is the head of the N Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “N”), the Internet shopping mall sales company for sales, such as mobile phones at the 5 and 6th floor of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan MM building; Defendant B, the head of N in Gwanak-gu, Seoul, the head of N’s site site branch office; Defendant G, the head of the Mapo-gu branch office of N in the fourth floor of the Seoul Mapo-gu P building; Defendant H, the head of the headquarters; Defendant C, and Defendant F, the head of the marry site team.

N In selling Internet shopping mall sites in N, the method of selling online shopping mall sites is not to set up an individual contractor's web site, but it is impossible for a contractor to exercise any management authority over the relevant shopping mall because it grants IDs that can be accessed as a member on the company's website. While the contractor's web site address is given, it is difficult for the contractor to access the contractor's web site without knowing the above site's address, and it is practically difficult for the contractor to sell the mobile phone, etc. because it is difficult for the contractor to access the contractor's web site, and the purchase of the mobile phone, etc. is not allowed directly at the Internet shopping mall site, but rather to communicate the phone number recorded on the website to the N office or send an application form to the N, so the online shopping mall site did not have any meaning or function to display pictures such as the mobile phone, etc., and most of the CCTV that is linked with the smartphones did not sell due to an error in the situation of conflict with intellectual property during development, etc., and most of the sales salesperson's payment for profits and sales.