logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.09.09 2016고단1706
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

(2) the date of this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. Violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts such as the Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts (such as brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts) committed a commercial sex acts business establishment under the trade name of “G” in collusion with the friendship-gu E, Gwangju-si, by leasing three floors of a building located in the North-gu, Gwangju-si, the Defendant was to receive reservation calls or guide customers at the said business establishment and to supply or manage the sales of female employees

According to the above public offering, the Defendant received KRW 70,00 or KRW 100,00 from the police officer from the middle of December 2015 to February 15, 2016, according to the course in which he/she received from his/her nameless customers, and provided guidance to the relevant room, and had female employees H, I, J, K, etc. do sexual intercourse with the guest, and E employed female employees and distributed the income earned from their business as above.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with E to arrange commercial sex acts.

B. In order to escape the Defendant from being punished as the fact that he operated “G” as above, the Defendant: (a) hired an employee B who was employed in the early January 2016, and told B to undergo a practical operation and an investigation at the time of crackdown; and (b) sent B along with E in the French site at the time of Gwangju City (hereinafter referred to as “Seoul city”) as he was actually controlled by the police around February 15, 2016; and (c) “N is called as the actual business owner of G, so the police officers known to him to the extent of fines and the fine would be resolved within the limit of fines.”

Therefore, the Defendant: (a) had B undergo an investigation from G to B on February 18, 2016; (b) around the same month; and (c) three times around April 7, 2016; and (c) had B operated the said establishment.

A false statement is made and B is made to submit a false lease contract in which B is the lessee.

As a result, the defendant instigated B to escape a person who commits a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

2...

arrow