logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2012.01.31 2010가합10616
부당이득금
Text

1. The defendant shall attach each of the corresponding amounts and the corresponding amounts stated in the separate sheet to the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The area of the housing site development project (hereinafter “instant housing site development project”) was incorporated into “the instant housing site development project district” in Namyang-si L, M, N, and Nam-si, Namyang-si. The said housing site development project (hereinafter “instant housing site development project”) was designated as a planned area for housing site development on October 7, 1998 and announced on October 12, 1998. On December 9, 2004, the alteration of the housing site development plan and the implementation plan were approved, announced, and announced publicly on November 10, 2005, to reduce that area into 2,058,453 square meters.

B. The Korea Land Corporation (Korea Land Corporation merged with the Korea Land Corporation on October 1, 2009, resulting in the Defendant’s succession to the rights and obligations of Korea Land Corporation; hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Defendant”), as part of the relocation measures against the Plaintiff, etc. who lost their base of livelihood due to the expropriation of the owned house, was incorporated into the instant project district, and decided to specially sell the land for detached houses to be created within the project district by implementing the instant housing site development project to them, and on November 23, 2005, announced the supply of the resettled housing site on November 23, 2005.

C. The Plaintiff A, B, C, E, F, G, H, H, and Nonparty C, U,V, and W, who had resided in the instant housing site development project district, concluded each sales contract with the Defendant to sell the “object of sale” (hereinafter “each of the instant detached housing sites”) as indicated in the following [Attachment 1] on the date of conclusion of the contract” as indicated in the same Table (hereinafter “each of the instant parcelling-out prices”) with the Defendant as “sale price” (hereinafter “each of the instant parcelling-out contracts”).

After that, Plaintiff D decided from T on February 16, 2006, Plaintiff J from October 2, 2006, Plaintiff K succeeded to the rights and obligations of each of the instant sales contract from W on October 26, 2009, and the Defendant consented thereto.

On the other hand.

arrow