logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.12.04 2012가단59303
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant: 145,813,450 won to Plaintiff A; 14,065,370 won to Plaintiff B; and 6,031,232 won to Plaintiff C and each of the said money.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The date and time of the accident: around 18:30 on April 22, 2011: (2) on the road located around approximately 200 meters in the direction of south Korea, located in the area northwest-gun D; (3) on the road located in the direction of south Korea; (4) on the part of the above vehicle, F driven by a G EFxa car volume (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) in the state of the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.078% in blood alcohol content in the direction of the main stream; (4) on the other hand, while driving the road at the direction of the oil station in the direction of the vehicle, while driving the road in the direction of the vehicle without properly viewing the front direction of the vehicle; and (4) on the road, the boundary of the waterway was crashed by the left side of the direction of the vehicle, and collisioned with the front part of the above vehicle.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). The instant accident caused the death of H on the top of the instant vehicle due to diversative trauma, etc. (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”), and Plaintiff A, on the back left of the instant vehicle, suffered from injury such as light signboards and external shock, etc.; Plaintiff B, on the left side of the Plaintiff, suffered from injury, such as snowbrow, urgical eye, urgical heat accompanied by the damage to the upper part of this end, and Plaintiff C, on the left side of the inner wall.

(4) The Defendant is the insurer of the instant vehicle.

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case.

C. The passengers of the instant vehicle whose responsibility is limited are F’s relationship F’s act of denying the deceased and her friendship (the wife of the deceased), and F’s relationship with the deceased (the plaintiff B, and C). At around 17:30 minutes prior to the occurrence of the instant accident, J in the former heading-gun I, after receiving the contact from the deceased and the plaintiffs, sent him/herself and the plaintiffs at around 17:0 minutes prior to the occurrence of the instant accident, caused the instant accident while the deceased and the plaintiffs were aboard at the office of the plaintiffs located in K. At the time of the instant accident, five drivers, including the driver F, on the instant vehicle. At the time of the instant accident, the latter seat was on board, but the safety belt was not worn.

arrow