logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.12.06 2018고단6132
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Cuba in the Republic of Korea.

On June 29, 2018, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 09:53 on June 29, 2018, and proceeded at a speed of about 40 km per hour from the opposite direction to the opposite direction of the city at a speed of about 30 km from the opposite direction of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, and came to turn to the left at the opposite direction of the opposite direction.

Since the left turn is an intersection where a signal is installed, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to make a left turn, and drive the motor vehicle safely in accordance with the new code and prevent the accident from being delayed.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so, and the vehicle driving signal was changed to a yellow signal, but the Defendant neglected it and left turn to the left, but was normally left in the same direction as it was due to the negligence of disregarding it.

In order to avoid the conflict with the Defendant’s driving vehicle, F. F. F. F. F. F. bus operated the bus above the bus floor of the passenger G (W. 42 years old), the passenger (W. 40 years old), the victim H (W. 40 years old), and the victim I (W. 42 years old).

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim G by negligence in the course of performing the above duties to each of the following injury, such as salt pans, tensions, etc. in the clify that requires approximately 3 weeks of treatment to the victim G, and to the same H, such as salt pans, damage, etc. in the nearest water that requires approximately 14 days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. One and two motor vehicles accident reports;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation of emergency patients;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under the relevant Act concerning criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that suspension of execution (such as the fact agreed with the part of the victim and the fact that it is against the depth of the victim).

arrow