The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant (a fine of eight million won, etc.) is too unfluent and unreasonable.

2. In light of the fact that each of the instant crimes committed by the Defendant, upon intrusion into several female toilets, took or attempted to take photographs of the body of victims who could cause a sense of sexual shame to unspecified victims, and that the crime was bad, the need to punish the Defendant significantly is recognized.

However, in full view of the following: (a) the Defendant recognized each of the instant crimes and against his mistake; (b) agreed with the victim D, G; (c) the Defendant was the primary offender; and (d) the Defendant’s age, family environment, and circumstances before and after the commission of the instant crimes; and (c) the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, the Defendant’s sentence against the Defendant is too uneasible and unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[However, pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure, Article 15 and Article 14(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (the violation of attempted crimes of using carmers, etc.) is added in advance of "the selection of each fine" of the three pages 15 and 16 of the judgment of the court below.]