logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.09.15 2017고정1672
건강기능식품에관한법률위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who sells health functional foods in the name of “E” on the five floors of the building in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and Defendant B is a person who sells health functional foods in the trade name of “G” in the Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F 103.

No one shall indicate or advertise that the health functional foods are effective or effective in the prevention and treatment of diseases, or that they are likely to be mistaken or mixed with drugs, with respect to the name, raw materials, manufacturing methods, nutrients, ingredients, methods of use, quality, and tracking and management of records of health functional foods.

1. On March 21, 2017, Defendant A introduced “I” products on the H website, which is an Internet site, and advertised Defendant A with a phrase written that the said products contain large amounts of Bluta A, thereby realizing blood in a clean and good condition, and with a view to facilitating the prevention and improvement of high blood pressure, urology, urology, cinology, and husium, and the development of pulmonary organs and fire extinguishing devices, thereby raising immunity.

As a result, the defendant, when taking I, advertised the contents that are likely to cause mistake or confusion as a medicine and efficacy, efficacy, effect, or medicine for the prevention and treatment of diseases.

2. From September 1, 2016 to March 2017, Defendant B requested an advertisement to the effect that “I products sold by the Defendant are “K” as its title in the daily newspaper of J, and, at the same time, the instant advertisement was published by requesting the advertisement to the effect that “I products sold by the Defendant were damaged from a disease that was born for more than 10 years in the course of completely completing treatment for hospital treatment and health in the private law, where the patient was tending to receive from urology with urology for more than 10 years, but the medical treatment was not completely cured, but I products released from L with urology was not completely cured.”

As a result, if the defendant uses I, it is likely that he will be aware of, or confused with, the efficacy, effect, or medicine for the prevention and treatment of diseases.

arrow