The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (six months of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The lower court, based on favorable circumstances, sentenced the above punishment by taking into account the following: (a) the Defendant had been punished several times of fraud; (b) the victim C committed a crime during the repeated crime period; (c) the victim C was not recovered from damage; and (d) the Defendant was unable to receive a letter from the victims; and (c) each of the of the of the instant crimes was committed against the Defendant; and (d) on October 27, 2016, the Ulsan District Court sentenced the Defendant to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Ulsan District Court, which was sentenced on November 4, 2016, and the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, with regard to concurrent crimes, at the same time, to take into account the case and equity.

In full view of the circumstances, other than the circumstances considered by the lower court, there is no change of circumstances in the lower court’s sentencing, and all other conditions of sentencing, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, background leading up to the commission of the offense, means and consequence, scale of the offense, and circumstances after the commission of the offense, the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed reasonable, and the lower court’s judgment exceeded the reasonable bounds of its discretion.

There is no circumstance that the assessment or maintenance of it is deemed unfair (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). Therefore, as claimed by the Defendant, the lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable because it is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.