logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.05.17 2017고단129
재물손괴등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

When the defendant does not pay a fine, 100,000 won shall be converted into one day.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On December 5, 2016, the Defendant of “2017 Godan 129”, on December 5, 2016, 2016, in Gangdong-gu Seoul, where the victim resides with the victim C ( South Korea, 70 years of age) in a de facto de facto marital relationship with 00:50 years of age, broken down the part in favor of the string of the string, with the string floor, on the ground that the victim does not open the door as soon as possible, and laid down the reflects, such as kimchi, by entering the inside of the house, opening a cooling house, and opening a door,

The utility of the property used jointly with the victim by means of raising the gimchis to the floor and raising the gimchis into the floor.

On January 22, 2017, the Defendant lent money to the victim in a de facto marital relationship with the victim C (the remaining and 70 years of age) on or around 04:30 on January 22, 2017. However, the Defendant destroyed the property, such as the electric spawn, and the electric spawn, two tape recorderss in the house where the victim spawns and spawns and satns and satns were laid on the floor and damaged the market price of 10,000 won, and the sound recording machine in a market price of 20,000 won.

On March 11, 2017, the Defendant, around 15:05, 2017, 1043, to the victim C (70 years of age) who operated a street store in front of the Fel in Gangdong-gu Seoul, Gangdong-gu, Seoul. “In the Republic of Korea, I am able to see that the goods within the city are within the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's no-standing operation of the street store by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of C’s respective statement protocol Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Articles 366 and 314 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 37 and 38 of the Criminal Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Part concerning dismissal of public prosecution under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with detention in a workhouse;

1. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in the preceding paragraph, 2017 Godan 129 of the facts charged, was the victim by putting a bat of the victim’s bat, thereby shouldering the victim’s shoulder.

arrow